Curiouser and curiouser behind the scenes o’ this blog…in terms of the “Democratic” Party.

Gotta love WordPress.  I do.  One thing I can see is who comes by, and it is very easy to follow over to the source, when linked.  One of my posts regarding the Feminist perspective on Alice Palmer got dropped off over at a VERY chic place. My, my.  I’m pretty concerned about some things I read behind the scenes about what Obama did to Alice Palmer in Chicago back in 1996.  It wasn’t very nice, once you start looking into it.  The question that I have is could he be pulling a similar stunt on Hillary Clinton is this election?

Who are Obama’s “operatives?”

I wonder who really knows?  One of them is Jeremiah Wright.  One of them is Rezko.  One of them is Soros.  One of them is somebody named Farrakhan.  How many others are there?  And then, there are all of these other people.  Here’s what I left for Craig Crawford over at Trail Mix in part:

“…I think you should look into how fundraising has been done, by who, and especially while the FEC is closed and cannot make rules about use of the internet so that all candidates have a level playing field.  There is something unethical and illegal about the electioneering going on.  Websites can come and go for fundraisng, can’t they?  Money can be laundered?  Amounts under $200 aren’t tracked according to this: http://www.opensecrets.org/

These places will show you who is behind what and why, in a way, if you look around inside them.  The associations are troubling, no?

http://www.ndn.org/

http://www.newpolitics.net/

http://www.newpolitics.net/content_areas/new_tools_campaign_2

http://www.neworganizing.com/blog/   …”

It’s what I’ve been talking about all along.  The fundraising going on, and Obama’s web connections who have all lined up behind him especially in terms of target marketing.  I don’t think they ever intended to help Hillary Clinton.  I’m wondering if they are actual Democrats?  They seem to have an agenda of their own, and they seem almost like Republicans in drag, in a way.  As if they are posing as Democrats?

They seem to have a lot of plans too, for how America should look.  Personally, I’m kind of happy with the “old” Democratic Party and the way America has looked.  The rest of this stuff isn’t being reported on by our mainstream press.  Probably because of the cutbacks, or something.  Also, most reporters on TV are pretty shallow, except PBS.  But, I don’t think Craig Crawford is.  In fact, I might even buy one of his books, because it looked so cool.  He’s here in the wiki.

In the meantime, look at these people, over at Against Obama. You see, ordinary Democrats have never heard all these foreign names and foreign ideas before.  Who are these people?  I hope that Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and John McCain and even President Bush are going to look into this matter.

There seems to be a big, big, problem with the FEC in Washington, and here is the biggest article on that from ALTERNET.  They are closed right now at the FEC.  This should be rectified, very soon.  You know why?  Some of these friends of Obama’s have been accused of money laundering.  Who is going to investigate the millions this campaign has raised behind the scenes?  Who is funding him?  Who wants to make sure that he gets in, and why?  We need the FEC to look into these things in Washington.

One thing about Presidential Elections?  They ought to be LEVEL playing fields.  I’m not seeing that, in this case.  Having things look like a level playing field?  That’s the AMERICAN WAY, isn’t it?

So, somebody named Meg just happened to drop off my piece on Alice Palmer over there at Craig Crawford’s Trail Mix.  I left him a little note.  Let’s see whether he even got it, or whether he will follow up on all the research I did.  I think most Democrats are going to find  those sites above to be very interesting.  The articles, the information, and the questionable connections.  When you start talking about “Changing Congress”  what exactly do you have in mind?

Somebody else in my comments section dropped off this piece about how Obama is going to have to start mending “hearts.” Well, I don’t think he can.  Not for feminists.  Not for me.  Or my friends in the web.  Once I saw those slums of his in Chicago?  With Rezko? His associations are too weird, he doesn’t seem to have actual plans, and I question his status as an AMERICAN with the ties he has.

There are people a lot smarter than me writing the articles I read.  Just wanted to clue you in to few concerns from the FEMINIST set.  We want Hillary Clinton, because she is a tried and true AMERICAN.  In lieu of her?  JOHN McCAIN.  Got that?  GOOD.  And Craig Crawford, I trust you.  Go ahead and report on it.  I’ll be waiting to see what you have to say, and I’ll make sure you get read by those whose read me.  Restore my faith in the media will you, for the American Public?

And Colin Powell?  Could you see what is going on with all of these foreign associations and things behind the scenes?  That would make me feel really good, right now.  Because this whole election?  It’s making me feel very AMERICAN, and VERY BETSY ROSS.  I really care about our flag, and what our flag means.  And Al Gore?  Could you help too?  Thank you. Or you, Barbara Boxer?  I voted the two of you in, once.  As I voted for Bill Clinton.  Happy Memorial Day weekend, to all of you.